IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

  • WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not trolling, I’m genuinely asking. What doesn’t fall into the definition of a third world country?

      • MissJinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Except that doesn’t apply anymore. Words change meaning over time and this expression has definitely changed. You cannot use the same definition as 50 years ago because it no longer applies. Yes, currently US is a third world country and the only reason it’s not “seen as it” os because of propaganda and old people power/money.

        As a non american we 100% see america as 3rd world. And you guys have no idea how much propaganda you get bombarded by daily

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            We literally did come up with new terms after the cold war. We now say Developing and Developed nations.

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nope that was apparently too confusing, now we say global north and global south.

              It’s a much better system, see Australia in the south of the globe, is in the global north for instance. It just makes perfect sense.

        • NotNotMike@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m sorry but that’s still the meaning of the term. I know it is colloquially understood to mean a “poor” country, but we shouldn’t ignore the original intent.

          Also, please don’t tell me how my country is. I quite literally live here. I can read every article online that you can, plus I can go outside and see it for myself. We know we have problems, we aren’t ignorant to them - at least not all of us - and they’re nowhere near as bad as some commentors on this post believe they are.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          As a non american we 100% see america as 3rd world.

          Speak for yourself. I see it as fucked up, but definitely not third-world…

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago
      • 1st world = US, NATO, and their allies.
      • 2nd world = USSR, China, the Warsaw Pact, and their allies.
      • 3rd world = everyone else.

      e.g. Switzerland would be a 3rd world country by the original definition.

    • ZephrC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Third world actually came from the cold war. There were the two major sides, but then there was a whole bunch of countries that weren’t really on either side. A whole “third world”. Of course, a lot of those countries were poor, so the term came to be associated with that, but there really isn’t a coherent definition of what it means to be a third world county. It has never really been about the standard of living for the average citizen though. More about whether a country is a bully or the bullied on the international stage, and we all know where the US falls on that spectrum.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a term rooted in geo-political alliances and power standings, not economic status