If you haven’t heard of it, this island has a population that the world has collectively decided to leave alone, mostly because they have proven, on multiple occasions, that they absolutely do not want visitors. Like, arrow-to-death anyone attempting to land or even visit near their shores.

This probably cannot go on forever… but maybe, it could. Essentially, we are already implementing a ‘Prime Directive’ of sorts here. Would the 23rd, 24th, … centuries in Star Trek canon still have this little island on Earth, isolated from not just from Earth’s own unified Federation society, but from the greater Federation races? What steps would the Federation and Earth take to maintain their isolation and the ecosystem on which they depend?

Would make for an interesting episode, or at least a cool side-note reference in one :)

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    There is an episode of Voyager where Seven and Chakotay get stuck in a nature reserve which is populated by an uncontacted species of humanoid. This reserve is separated from the rest of the planet by a force field.

    So i would say yes. The Federation would put up a shield and forbid people from entering.

  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I imagine that the events leading up to the formation of the Federation would disrupt their way of life. Most notably, WWIII, which most likely could wipe them out. Assuming they remain somehow untouched, the eventual visible air traffic might draw out the more curious among their population.

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m pretty sure there’s visible air traffic there today. Veer Savarkar International Airport is only ~30 miles away from North Sentinel Island, so they probably see planes on a daily basis.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That island is safe but you just know Riker is going to touch everything on MILF Island.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Somehow the Ferangi would manage to sell them photon torpedoes. They’d still fire at anyone who approached their island .

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t even remember what the original (wrong) link I had posted was that you were replying to here :). Sounds interesting

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Ah jeeze. They have one of those stupid setups where if you scroll far enough you get to the next article transparently. And it actually changes the URL. I’d gotten to the end of tbe article I meant to post, but when I copied the URL it was for the next article.

        Fixed the link.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s ludicrous to describe a lone missionary as “storming the island by force”.

        I agree that it was a foolish move on his part, though.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m aware he didn’t storm the island by force - I didn’t use those words. The implication was that he went where it was made abundantly clear he wasn’t wanted - more than once - and suffered the consequences.

          • elephantium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The comment you responded to used those words, though.

            I’m surprised no one has demanded storming the island by force

            At least one idiot tried

            Re-reading it, I suppose you meant to invoke “something stupider” which does make sense. Carry on!