• sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not really anymore. People pay subscription fees for all types of software and most collect and sell your data. FOSS software is free and doesn’t spy on you most of the time. The tables have turned

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yup, paying for something doesn’t guarantee good behavior, but not paying for something that most charge for almost guarantees bad behavior.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        FOSS is kind of an interesting case, because it sometimes operates with donations or grants just to improve development times and outcomes.

        Anyway, the sentiment is still something to consider, even in the world of FOSS. It’s less likely, mostly because people do it as hobby or communal projects, but that kind of trust can be abused. However, the original sentiment was intended more for endeavors where it costs money to maintain and operate a service, not anticapitalist software projects.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Residential IPs” are quite valuable for web scraping. Many scraping prevention tools and services use the source IP as the primary metric. If you come from a public cloud provider like AWS, GCP or DigitalOcean you get blocked 99% of the time. If you come from a US residential ISP then you get much more relaxed screening.

    • twisterpop3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Someone who is planning to commit crime could do so from your home IP address. At best, the police/FBI recognize that you didn’t do the crime. At worst, you get charged for something you didn’t do.