Wow, what a wanker.

Removed by mod

If you’re anywhere north of 10 years old, you still have a lot of growing up to do. Thanks for showing me exactly what kind of person you are and I hope you have a day that is just as wonderful as you are.

Hold on here. Was it that you knew it wouldn’t translate well in text or was it that we’d need to use our brains but didn’t? Because you seem to change your story so that you can blame everyone else for misunderstanding because you were vague.

It’s funny you call us Redditors: I’m engaging with you (and increasingly regretting it) instead of just downvoting and moving on, while you’re blaming others instead of owning up to your actions. Which exactly is classic Reddit behavior?

You made a comment you knew wouldn’t translate well to text and didn’t try to make sure others would understand your intent. Someone took it seriously, so your response is “knew someone would get all hurt by it though” instead of owning up to it.

I have this wild suggestion for it. Don’t write ambiguous messages. If you do and it confuses or offends someone, explain or apologize instead of being a wanker and pretending the other people are the problem. You’re the problem here, mate.

Ackshualllly, it’s ephebophilia because these are young women above the age of…

/s

Just kidding, it’s CP

Username does NOT check out, great write up. Easily a perfect 5/7.

That’s fine but, if you don’t read the article, don’t comment on it like you did. I’m not suggesting that’s what you did, but that’s clearly what many people here did.

P.s. use 12ft.io and archive.ph to get around pay walls.

If there’s a pay wall and you don’t use something like 12ft.io or archive.ph to get around it, just don’t comment. There’s no requirement to comment and those that do so without knowing what the article is actually about are providing commentary on their imaginations.

The biggest failure here is the number of people who obviously didn’t read the article. Why comment if you don’t know what you’re actually commenting about? Is this the writing equivalent to loving the sound of your own voice?

Edit: I can’t believe my latest most controversial take is “maybe don’t discuss what an article says unless you read it first”. Just can’t make this shit up.

Considering many buildings don’t have air conditioning, you’re spot on.

Consider yourself lucky. Many older European homes don’t have bathroom fans. Some older bathrooms barely have windows.

The irony of you actually being a passive aggressive douchebag by pretending the op might be passive aggressive is off the charts.

Removed by mod

deleted by creator

Big oof here. Maybe make sure you understand what you’re talking about before criticizing others?

I’m 99% certain you’re from the United States if you think MSNBC is anything beyond center to center left.

LOL

I see you learned your discussion skills from the Donald Trump School of Bullshiting.

You’d have to ask op, we can only guess at anything beyond what they wrote. That’s my entire point.