i like the topic, and i dare say i have a neutral point of view.
i like the topic, and i dare say i have a neutral point of view.
none of that appears to be activism, it looks like awareness-raising/proselytizing. you’ll see the posts i’ve been making are about actually helping animals.
I’m not a vegan, so I’m not welcome
one post every two weeks is not very active
plant based is about a diet. I’m seeding the vegan community with stories about activism.
if you have something to say, say it.
everyone knows how you “investigate” other users, so my guess is you already did look through my posts, and you saw most of what I do is demand evidence for specious claims.
so maybe you shouldn’t smear people baselessly
you have no proof for any of this.
you have no proof for any of these claims.
oooh. now do economics!!
if anyone thinks any of these spammed links is proof, please point it out. I’m not clicking every one. this is the most blatant Gish gallops I’ve seen in months.
calling me names won’t change the facts.
only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn’t actually support the claim that you’re using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don’t make the same very strong claim that you have.
edit: “them” was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.
no, I’m examining your position, and the evidence provided, and found that they are insufficient.
it shows that the evidence you’ve provided doesn’t actually support your claim
the only power reviewed source you provided spends as much time detailing risks as it does explaining potential benefits, and it’s based on a single case study.
You’re on the block list now.
oh thank God.
calling me names doesn’t change the facts
disroot
depending on your politics, autistici