ferret

Honestly, as an american, I could live with watered down rights if it meant a more representative government

But the vision pro is permitted to use wireless?

Ooh, neat

They had the balls to call wine an emulator

It does, you can capture it with any halfway decent camera so long as it’s backlit by the sun and it’s dark out (and your timing is perfect)

Probably a USB controller, considering that is what they said explicitly in the title. And probably the bandwidth the controller advertises to downstream devices.

Is it actually a 60w iron or does it only hit that current when heating from roomtemp and not when keeping the tip on temperature?

Pinecil tips are standardized and third party options are extremely cheap on aliexpress or amazon

The pinecil will go up to 126w if you have a capable power supply. I am going to be honest though, 16awg isn’t that large. A 45w iron could probably handle that fine if you are ok with waiting a but for your wires to get up to temp.

The pinecil is an excellent iron that is not expensive in the slightest

I forgot samsung was one of the bleeding-edge fabs

You don’t need a lens, just a differently shaped mirror. Their point is just that the light you capture is based on the mirror’s surface area, so if you are selling sunlight-equivalent amounts of light you would need a mirror of equal area to that you are selling. You would not need such a large mirror to sell an area of dimmer light, and you would not need a lens.

Where have you heard that? The whole reason jack exists is professional audio

Wsl is just a vm

I am not sure I understand, OP is clearly misinterpreting the text they quote

Wayland is the default on blender, that is what that text says

I bet we can do it in three.

Nasa should not have to contend with budget cuts.

Alternative is like… a single gigabyte of local storage on these things

I don’t think this is a bad question at all, personally I would prefer to mount the drive once and symlink folders for a couple reasons:

1. It’s easier to automate
2. it’s theoretically faster (to initialize) as symlinks are effectively free
3. I personally like symlink syntax more than mount syntax :P

One possible con to symlinks is that certain (linux native) software can misbehave when it has to interact with them, but this is a fairly uncommon issue. Stuff ran through wine or proton should support them just fine, as they are abstracted away.