that’s your interpeetation. what’s missing for me is “must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable”. with this wording i could just say: “this data is not obtainable” and be done with it.
that’s your interpeetation. what’s missing for me is “must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable”. with this wording i could just say: “this data is not obtainable” and be done with it.
no it doesn’t. it only says the weights an information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.
this is the attack on stallman
seems prett damning to me
also i’m going to let devault himself rebut this
also no: stallman being under attack for credible accusations and even non-retracted public statements is not an “attack on free software” but a much needed clean up. call it a refactoring of legacy assets, if you want.
BUT IT’S A SINGLE BINARY! UNACCEPTBLE!!! THE BLOAT OF IT ALL!
it was a joke xD i like busybox (and systemd) i don’t particularly subscribe to the unix way, but to each their own ¯\(ツ)/¯
“Noooooooo! One tool should do one thing and one thing only! Blasphemy! Heresy! Anthema! Systemd!” crying in unix design philosophy
cackles in firefox…
On the official page it says that it is pronounced For Jay Yo (at least close enough)