12·
20 days agoThat is not overcompensation, that is risk management 101.
- 0 Posts
- 32 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
6·25 days agoFeel like I’m destroying the dataset with QWERTY so I’ll wait until QWERTZ is available :)
2·1 month agoYour command needs to look something like this:
nmap -Pn -sVC -p- (IP) -o scan
-Pn skips the availability check per ping
-sVC performs a version and a script scan so you get more information
-p- scans ALL ports
-o puts out a file called scan.nmap
If you want you can share that output afterwards for further info.
Edit: You can also try enumerating the directories on the server if you find no content. I can help you with that if you want.
It needs to be specific to be clear for its purposes. You can express everything in simpler terms but then you risk leaving things out of definitions. It’s basically legal speak.
Normally, you’d read the scope of such a document to see whether it fits your purpose, then cherry-pick the chapters necessary. If something’s unclear, you can google pretty much everything.
Doing that a few times will make it infinitely easier! You especially get to understand those broad, inaccessible definitions a lot easier.
17·2 months agoAnd for the full Linux experience do it at the perfect moment, such as when you’re in a lecture or customer presentation!
What was the comment? That the source is untrustworthy? Why was it removed?
If you show me how that’s physically possible I will concede your point, but until then: No, that’s not nearly the same. You can’t just selectively block physical ads.
While the comparison may make sense when not thinking it through, print is a completely different medium than digital where comparisons only make limited sense. In this one they don’t at all.
Physical media does not track views (directly) or click through numbers, for example.
You are just self-important and cannot come to terms with reality, lol. All those creators and their content would not exist in this form, for free, without YouTube. All other platforms are locked behind a paywall.
But geniuses like you then talk down paywalls as well, because how dare they monetize their time?! You just want everything for free - be honest about it.
They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.
They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.
SponsorBlock does not change anything about the money they get from sponsorships. So no, that does not help them more than otherwise.
You’re really spending a lot of energy calling piracy not piracy.
You’re just justifying your actions. YouTube is not free to run, and the content there is not free to create. You’re a parasite.
Don’t worry, I’m as well - but be honest about it. What you’re doing, and many other gigabrains here, is just pathetic. There is a lot of corporate greed in this world, but this ain’t it.
No, that’s called nuance and honesty.
Satoshi Nakamoto is some kind of consipracy…?
Satoshi Nakamoto.
The corruption drips slowly inside as well.
I do as well!
It’s easier to use and has a recommendation algorithm.