Twitch rescinds policy that allowed ‘artistic nudity’ / The decision comes two days after the company said it would allow some sexual content::Twitch has quickly taken back its policy update that gave users permission to post sexual content as long as it was labeled.

  • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy strawmen, Batman! You’ve assembled an entire hay loft of them there, gramps!

    At first I thought you were coming from a place of bias and baseless stereotyping but now I know for a fact that you are.

    Get out of the way and let people younger than your apparent 80 years express themselves how they want to.

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I’ve been taken prisoner by the concept that unnecessary censorship is a bad thing. Good deduction, Sherlock. 🙄

        • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah man… I’m not even talking about censorship. I don’t care if Twitch shows tits or not. I’m purely focused on the use of the word ‘art’ to justify looking at naked people. Like… just say you want to look at naked people. Be honest.

          Like there’s all these ‘burlesque’ dance troupes who say their performances are “artistic”. Ok. Do them fully clothed and see how well your audience numbers seem.

          There’s very little intelligent merit in doing x y z naked apart from letting thirsty people have a tingle.

          Whatever. I’m done here. See ya.