• Loucypher@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      17 days ago

      if you wanted to run macOS on this then yes, it would definitely be ewaste

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        17 days ago

        I personally don’t share the same definition of e-waste. Having to install Linux, a custom ROM or modded software to make the machine fully usable doesn’t make it complete e-waste imo. Conputer users should have technical knowledge to do stuff like that.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          64
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          That’s the point. Most users don’t know how to do that, can’t be bothered to learn, so this laptop would have been e-waste under most other circumstances.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            I think their confusion comes from OPs title.

            Why is it “e-waste go brrrrrrr” when OP is presumably saying they’re keeping this laptop out of the machine? _ machine go brr is a dumb meme in the first place, people using it the wrong way makes it even dumberer.

            • FippleStone@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              Oh man I cannot stand it, it’s a tolerable meme format at best when used correctly, but I find it insufferable when it’s applied mindlessly like this

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            17 days ago

            Yes but if a person uses a computer and doesn’t want to learn stuff, issues that come from it are (at least partially) their fault.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              17 days ago

              Sure, but that’s kind of a nonsequitur to the question of whether this would have ended up as e-waste.

              A: Would this end up as e-waste?
              
              B: It's the end-users' fault if it does.
              
              A: Okay, so...would this end up as e-waste?
              

              We don’t literally know, because we can’t predict the future, but we can be reasonably certain that old tech like this laptop would have become e-waste in the hands of your average user, regardless of whether they should have been expected to take the time to learn how to prevent that or not.

        • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          17 days ago

          My parents (who are nearly 70-year-old computer users, by the way, and threw away their 2010 Apple laptop in 2015 because it essentially stopped functioning) absolutely don’t have the technical knowledge to do something like this. I think you may be vastly overestimating the average user.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Conputer users should have technical knowledge to do stuff like that.

          It’s not the 80s anymore. Normies are using computers now.

            • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              17 days ago

              Happens. Cars used to need special skills to even get started and drive around. Now a five year old can start one and drive off if they can reach the pedals. But they won’t have any clue how it actually works.

        • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Most corporations are not going to do that because they often standardize around products with known solutions for management that come with service guarantees. No one wants to support a small fleet of aging hardware running an os outside the dominant platform.