• ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They’re trying to make people associate the term “AI” with its long form spelled out, which is obviously Apple Intelligence. The goal would eventually be that when people throw out the term AI, it’s assumed that they mean apple intelligence.

    • Quicky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is exactly why, and as simple as it is, it’s brilliant passive marketing. It stealthily implants an association to Apple Intelligence into every product and article that mentions AI, and might even require the author to distinguish their meaning when they use the acronym. They’ve Sherlock’d AI.

  • spaduf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let’s be honest. They certainly plan to, but first they’re gonna see if saying “Apple Intelligence” a bunch is going to convince people they actually did something innovative.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most large opensource models run just fine on 8gb. It’s absolutely nothing new…

      • spaduf@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        This isn’t actually innovative it is just not OpenAIs business model. This recent trend is honestly a much smaller blip than most people recognize.

    • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?

      • Paradox@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Google has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3

      • spaduf@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.

        • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok, so either way, there’s innovation no?

          I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here

          • spaduf@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I dunno if ‘Siri but functional’ is good enough to get points from me. That said this is definitely good for the industry

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    couldn’t you at least choose a name with different initials?

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the whole point. They’ll try to take over the AI brand by doing this.

      "So what does AI actually stand for? "

      “It stands for Apple Intelligence, of course!”

      “Wow, Apple really is everywhere, they are so good and competent.”

      This will happen too often.

      • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        The worst part about this is us calling it “Apple intelligence” ironically will make idiots believe that to be correct.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        yeah but then it doesn’t make sense to refuse to call it AI.

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It does, because now it’s their own thing.

          So instead of having what everyone else is having, they have their own and also hijack theirs, because Apple put the company name in it.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      So I’ve been at a corporate offsite all week. I’m sick of hearing about “alpha” and “genai”. Business and leadership are so up their own asses. I’ve been holding back so long on asking a question around the general morality of the bed they’re making. I’m so curious where the future is going to go. We are in an arms race when it comes to LLMs

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Of course not. They didn’t think of it but they name their shit so it abbreviates to it. What a bunch of pretentious assholes.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because they can’t patent it and troll everyone else for money.

      • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Samsung Lawsuits: Apple’s series of lawsuits against Samsung over alleged patent infringements related to smartphone and tablet designs and functionalities have been seen by some as overly aggressive. These lawsuits have led to significant financial penalties for Samsung and have been viewed as attempts to stifle competition rather than protect genuine innovations.

        App Store Patents: Apple has been known to enforce its patents related to the App Store, targeting other companies that have tried to create similar platforms. This has sometimes been criticized as an attempt to maintain a monopoly over app distribution for iOS devices.

        HTC Lawsuit: In 2010, Apple filed a lawsuit against HTC for allegedly infringing on 20 Apple patents related to the iPhone’s user interface and underlying architecture. Some viewed this as an aggressive move to slow down the growth of Android devices.

        Patent Assertions Against Smaller Companies: There have been instances where Apple has asserted its patents against smaller companies or startups. Critics argue that these actions can stifle innovation and competition, as smaller companies often lack the resources to fight prolonged legal battles against a giant like Apple.

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          App Store Patents

          “Apple denies that, based on their common meaning, the words ‘app store’ together denote a store for apps”

          Actual quote from a legal filing by Apple in 2011. It’s about copyright but the effect and intent is the same. They wanted Amazon to not use the term “app store”.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Did you generate this with chat gpt? And that’s not being a patent troll. A patent troll is specifically a company that buys up patents, that they do not intend to use and never do, and then sue for them. E.g. a company that does nothing, produces no value, and simply takes others to court for what they own.

          • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah it was generated, and you are right. I’m not sure how to format stuff to show it’s AI generated so I just use the quotes.