• paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    If feel like this community could use a bot that comments the following on every post:

    • Sail the high seas
    • Switch to Linux
  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Presumably to minimize exposure while they add the announced security band-aids?

    So… while I have you guys here, how do we feel about iOS having just announced basically the same feature? We angy about that one too or nah?

    I mean, joking aside, I’m genuinely curious about what the reaction is going to be. On paper it’s a very similar concept, but it feels like routing it through Siri and not surfacing the stored data will legitimately kill some of the creepy factor even if what’s happening behind the scenes is very similar.

    • chrash0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      people generally probably hate the iOS integration just because it’s another AI product, but they’re fundamentally different. the problem with Recall isn’t the AI, it’s the trove of extra data that gets collected that you normally wouldn’t save to disk whereas the iOS features are only accessing existing data that you give it access to.

      from my perspective this is a pretty good use case for “AI” and about as good as you can do privacy wise, if their claims pan out. most features use existing data that is user controlled and local models, and it’s pretty explicit about when it’s reaching out to the cloud.

      this data is already accessible by services on your phone or exists in iCloud. if you don’t trust that infrastructure already then of course you don’t want this feature. you know how you can search for pictures of people in Photos? that’s the terrifying cLoUD Ai looking through your pictures and classifying them. this feature actually moves a lot of that semantic search on device, which is inherently more private.

      of course it does make access to that data easier, so if someone could unlock your device they could potentially get access to sensitive data with simple prompts like “nudes plz”, but you should have layers of security on more sensitive stuff like bank or social accounts that would keep Siri from reading it. likely Siri won’t be able to get access to app data unless it’s specified via their API.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The fans will lap it up and all those Apple YouTubers will gush about how Apple’s new invention is the best invention ever. Apple has the advantage of owning a cult.

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I disagree, I think Apple will do this feature with privacy/security in mind which Microsoft didn’t do.

        I absolutely don’t like Apple but I think it’s undeniable that they try to keep their OS secure. It’s still a golden prison but at least it takes privacy fairly seriously.

        Microsoft didn’t seem to think about the challenges of that feature and it looks like a draft from an intern after a 1 hour meeting.

        Obviously, something that scan a user screen has some implications that are hard to miss.

        So yeah it’s easy to point at people and say they are fanboys. But in this case the fanboys would be probably right in the sense that Apple already did better than Microsoft when it comes to privacy.

        At the end of the day both are businesses that you shouldn’t trust with your data but I would trust a lot more Apple than Microsoft for doing this right.

    • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just Say No To crApple has been my attitude towards them for years and their latest moves will not change that one tiny bit.

  • zcd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I bet they’ve come up with a new way to convince people to switch to Linux

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Vista was going to make everybody go Linux. Then Windows 8. Then Windows 11 requirements. Then Recall…

      Let’s me honest. Average Joe doesn’t understand or care.

      Right now for 75% of users it’s less work to install Linux than Windows, with all the crap people does to avoid TPM, Microsoft account, edge…

      • jorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s also still relatively easy to tinker with windows to remove things you don’t like while still getting to use all of your software. Linux requires a lot of tinkering too but it’s so that you can use your software in the first place. It’s easier for me to tinker to eventually remove bloat and disable features I don’t use than it is for me to have to tinker to use my software and features in the first place.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I love how Apple is flying under the radar, doing effectively the same thing, because they used the word “Private” in every heading and server name

    • edwardbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wrong. In the keynote, they announced that the server handling all this will be open source and anyone can analyse the code for exactly the malicious behaviour that Microsoft is pushing.

      I’m not an Apple shill, but at least this they handled much better than MS