• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Think back to when we were kids. Remember that period of time when not everyone owned a computer? Or if they owned one, it wasn’t necessarily used much? There were people that were “computer people”, who used computers daily for entertainment or tinkering or socializing (once the consumer internet took off) and there were people that didn’t need or care about them outside of their workstation at the office.

    Even after the Internet, this dynamic was there. You had the enthusiasts who really spent time on their computers and got to using them well, and you had people that simply owned them and checked email or browsed the Internet from time to time.

    The enthusiast/non-enthusiast dynamic has always existed. There’s always a gap. It just takes different shapes.

    Now, everyone owns a smartphone and uses for everything. They’re critical to life, enthusiast or no. That’s the baseline now. The gap is entirely in skill and usage, not so much hardware or time spent on it.

    Before computers and the internet, no tech skill was needed to interact with our modern world.

    After them, and for a few decades, the skill floor rose. You needed to learn technology to participate in the modern world.

    Now technology has reached a point where the skill floor has dropped down to where it was before.

    The mistake we made was in thinking that our generation learning to use technology was happening because they wanted to. It was incidental. Skill with technology comes from desire to obtain it, not simply using technology a lot.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      The mistake we made was in thinking that our generation learning to use technology was happening because they wanted to. It was incidental. Skill with technology comes from desire to obtain it, not simply using technology a lot.

      We learned the technology to accomplish specific mundane goals, and along the way learned the inner workings of the technology which became applicable to the working world. Now, to accomplish those same rather mundane tasks there is very little to learn, and very little ancillary learning benefit derived from doing those mundane things.