• kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unless unions work differently where you live, they are a democracy that will pursue whatever issues its members vote on. If members don’t think pay is a problem, why would they try to change it?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Had to explain this to my dad when he told me about the carpenters unions not allowing his brother to work after he retired.

      1: Unions are the democratization of workplaces; for better or for worse.

      2: Should you really be working when you’re claiming retirement checks from your union?

      3: People are often falsely confident on their views about things. People love to complain about the government while hardly understanding anything about it. The same happens everywhere, including unions. Just because some dude is miffed doesn’t mean they have any right to be. They can be misinformed.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Should you really be working when you’re claiming retirement checks from your union?

        As a carpenter? Yes and no. It shouldn’t compete with what union people are by and large doing for their steady bread and butter but completely outlawing earning any money is cruel to the type of busy-bees that many tradespeople are. Hand-craft chessboards or something, anything where skill and mastery is eclipsing the industrial aspect. Also teaching, training, and consulting. Retirement should be a role-change (if desired), not a kick to the curb. Also, accommodate for half-retirement: Half the cheque, half the jobs kind of situation.