It’s coming. He’s going to do it.

YOU’RE FIRED!

I wouldn’t mind if they did switch to threads. It would still be a chink in the stranglehold that Twitter has.

Trouble is that pushing the bytes on will be really difficult.

It’s a media that contains what a USB drive does. That’s great for one movie, not really as a slow data storage device.

Looking at the Product Conformance pages, it looks like you need a GCN 1.0 device for Vulkan 1.0 support (current is 1.4).

Thames was a Terrascale 2 architecture (i.e. the one before GCN1.0) and as such can’t support Vulkan or DX12.

Easier to dump the hot water and get new cold water.

Nvidias latest gen looks to be 30% faster after 2 years of development with about the same power usage increase. So no reduction in Joules per GOP, just a speed increase.

In 6 years they might go 2x the speed of today but need double the watts (to deliver the same energy in half the time).

A company can have value without making profit. It can own assets. It has value in its staff.

Now should it have a valuation like OpenAI? Fuck no!

The rationale for doing this must only be for fun. You’re talking about a project that will take man years, and the price of a new vulkan capable graphics card is $300-400.

I have no idea what this company is…who this person is…and by the looks of it, I’ll never need to.

Think we need a new channel.

!c/shitterthoughts

A federated system of discussion groups. That’s such a 90s idea.

Just learn the basic POSIX commands (there’s probably 20-25) and understand pipes. Then you can do pretty much anything you’re likely to need from the command line. Sure, there will be more modern flashy friendly tools that come along. Some you’ll integrate into what you do. Some won’t have enough staying power to remember.

No notes. No googling or LLM. Just don’t skip to the end.

An army of cybernetic penguins?

I can see lots of subtle bugs coming from this.

Develop and everything working great. Deploy on server with different HWCaps and you’re now running different code.

Op is right though. It’s still a cost/benefit situation, and the benefit is not enough to justify the cost.

Sure, but there’s an lot of people classifying disagreement as hatred and using that to stamp out the discourse we need to have as a society.

Take positive discrimination. Some see it as corrective action for historical injustices. Some see it as newspeak it for just another form of discrimination and two wrongs don’t make a right. There’s a societal discourse that needs to happen there.

Nobody is preaching hatred, but I expect I’ll get shit for even suggesting there’s a ethical argument against DEI.

It would be if the administration signed an ethics declaration.

Hydrocarbons. Carbohydrates are in bread, pasta and potatoes.