I thought the exact same thing and we should all endeavor to use 4616250 as a meme.
I thought the exact same thing and we should all endeavor to use 4616250 as a meme.
I’m convinced that most people (especially politicians) know that, they are just presenting fake alternatives to slow down investment in renewables. The ultimate goal is to keep burning fossils for a bit longer.
any cognitive Task. Not “9 out of the 10 you were able to think of right now”.
I guess he would know about imaginary friends …
and I distinctly said that it should be “a right”
Yes, you did, but you said it as part of an answer to the question “why are landlords considered parasites?”, and you explained that those who own more homes than they can live in are parasites. The logical conclusion (would be that it should be outlawed to be a landlord.
So, how am I to understand that? Should there be a quota, an acceptable amount of parasites so to speak?
People own apartments too. If you can’t own more than one home, surely apartments would also be covered by that?
If that means the government* subsidises it for the low income families (as in owns them and rents them at below market value), so be it.
Not everybody who doesn’t want to buy is low income. I’m too lazy / risk averse to maintain everything myself, so I happily pay my landlord a reasonable premium to bear the risk of shit burning down (or breaking in less dramatic ways) for me. I also like that I would be able to pack up and move without worrying about selling my old place. I might change my mind later on, but right now I’m good.
Why should governments subsidize the lifestyle choice I’m consciously making?
You assume that everybody wants to own and that just isn’t the case.
A jury can rule somebody not guilty even if they are convinced that they did the thing.
Same here, but I did occasionally get a similar full screen reminding me of that fact and urging me to buy a new PC. I installed Mint instead.
People keep saying “Linux is user friendly enough these days for even non techy people” and I’m sorry but it’s totally Not.
I guess people who say that think of the average non techy user as someone like me: I don’t really know how this works under the hood, but I do troubleshoot my own stuff, am willing and able to search for help and apply advice on my own, try different things, and hopefully realize when that advice starts to sound fishy.
The thing is, that’s not the average non-techy user. That’s already “dabbling in tech”.
The average non techy user is Homer going “oh, a talking moose on the Internet wants my credit card number? Sounds fair.”
The same is true for windows though. I have to help my dad with some minor thing at least once a month.
Often, they’ve forgotten the fucking password, if you’ve made it so they don’t have to put a password in when they log in
The second my father asks me about this is when I revoke his computer privileges.
Become unavailable on non-private messengers. Explain your reasons if asked, but stay stubborn. (And yes, it will turn out that a subset of people you know don’t give a shit about staying in contact with you.)
It’s not useless. It will enable MS to build the walled garden they want, where you are forced to use the software they permit you to and nothing else.
We are the Borg.
That doesn’t mean all fact checks are bullshit, just that fact checkers are people with jobs and opinions too.
There are other types of value, of course. It’s just funny to specifically call the apple out for being a myth. The entire story is a myth, so they could have made it a pomelo for all I care.
What is “truth value” supposed to mean?
It annoys me to no end whenever MS word does that.