• vollkorntomate@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    […] it uses the X25519 public key… as a symmetric key, for AES-GCM.
    […] anyone that knows the public key can decrypt it.

    Ouch.

  • aport@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m OOTL, why do people want an alternative to Signal? It thought that was the good app

    • Allah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      You need a phone number for Signal which means that your mobile provider will have your location, your IMSI, your mobile device model, serial number if you are using a T-Mobile or any other Telco" supplied device.

      If not then via the IMSI / mobile number they can get your location and details from Google / Apple etc and that not even considering your IP-Address

      Any time that there is a unique real world identifier the owner can be located. The only way around this would be to use something like Briar that use cryptographic uniqueness and that communicates via Onion like multihop anonymizers (TOR etc) from the outset.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s centralized, it doesn’t officially allow 3rd-party clients, it requires a phone number, and the desktop app kinda sucks. I use it anyway, but it could be better.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The “centralized” part is not a problem with their protocol and it’s well explained.

        The 3rd-party clients thing … I agree with, but one can find justifications for that too. They probably don’t want people to use it for filesharing with uuencode and base64. Or even for VPNs, like they did with Tox when it seemed to have a future.

        The phone number thing sucks, but there’s a need to defend against bot registrations somehow.

        The desktop app sucks absolutely and conclusively. If there were a library one can use to make a Pidgin plugin, it would be a godly gift.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not just sucks, but is limited. Like, you can’t even register there! To use Signal without a smartphone, you’d need workarounds that are unfriendly to an average person! All while a computer is far easier to make private than a phone.

    • Confetti Camouflage@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t know about other people, but the only thing I don’t like about Signal is that it is centralized. It seems to be the only option to actually get everything right for security though from what I hear.

      • Soatok Dreamseeker@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s a reasonable thing to dislike about it.

        I dislike that I can’t reply to another message with a sticker.

        I also dislike that, despite having admin access, I can’t delete abusive messages left in groups for anyone but myself. That makes it unsuitable for building communities.

        • ZaphodWilde42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The replying with stickers bugs me so much, your pack has been helpful too. Hopefully we’ll eventually be able to edit created packs though.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I personally think they could replace the “centralized” part with the “relay” part. Seems technically possible with their protocol. Their center plays mostly the relay role. So it would be a bit similar to Usenet, or to NOSTR, or even maybe to something like old Freenet.

        But yes, there are good arguments that making it decentralized would slow down necessary changes and fixes.

    • dracs@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve been using it for several months mostly due to it’s UnifiedPush notifications support and been really happy with it.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t care too much about the supposed hardening, but it’s on FDroid and has UnifiedPush, so I use it over Signal

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve used it because it actually allowed me to register, while the registration in the official app broke (my best guess is due to lack of Google services, because that’s the popup the app got stuck on). And if I knew about it earlier, I could’ve used it to register in an Android VM and then tie a desktop client - because unlike the original, it did not force you to use your camera, you could just use a link. Another important quality for me is the ability to use arbitrary Socks rather than Signal’s own - when every protocol has a chance to be blocked, flexibility is important, and having a standalone proxy may be more convenient than a whole-device VPN (that you’d have to keep on all the time to receive notifications).