db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 months agoSpeed Datinglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down111
arrow-up1115arrow-down1imageSpeed Datinglemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 months agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareonoira [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agooh, this must be why i have you tagged as ‘rule lawyer debate pervert’ randian techbros, i swear.
minus-squareEugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months ago“Debate me bro! I just refuse to accept the terms of the debate! You must comply to my terms, or you lose!”
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoAnd, er, what are “the terms of the debate”?
minus-squaredb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoAre they are Randroid too? uuugh
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·2 months agoalways with the ad hominem
oh, this must be why i have you tagged as ‘rule lawyer debate pervert’
randian techbros, i swear.
“Debate me bro! I just refuse to accept the terms of the debate! You must comply to my terms, or you lose!”
And, er, what are “the terms of the debate”?
Are they are Randroid too? uuugh
always with the ad hominem