• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    What are some reasons as to why I would want to use this over, say, OSMAnd?

    • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is way way lighter weight and is overall a better experience. I use osmand for routing because the voice is much better tuned (OM just says barely-useful things like “turn left” instead of “turn left at Broadway”. I think both have their uses. If the voice was better I would use OM exclusively.

      • ryguyflyguy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Organic Map’s voice turning instructions were just recently updated to include the street name (at least in the iOS TestFlight, not sure if it’s in the official release yet). This was something that was preventing me from fully switching over but since this change it is much more usable imo

        • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh yay! Happy times. The fdroid version doesn’t have that yet but I look forward to the update.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I use both all the time. Organic Maps rendering and navigation feels snappier, even with 2.5D support, and less cluttered, but since I do contribute to OpenStreetMap, OsmAnd is unmatched for editing and access to power tools like up-to-date data, GPS tracking, PDI editions, etc.

      Unfortunately, in my country the map is not as complete as the proprietary options, so, using OsmAnd is more practical for me. As a regular user, though, I’d prefer Organic Maps.