Correct, you’re lived experience means nothing to me, that’s for people who know you. As for statistics, you presented none.

And for the rest, you’ve invented a lot of what you think I said.

Take your victimhood elsewhere, there are people with real problems at the moment, as you can see there are pedo’s and worse to deal with, which compared to your issues, is a mountains to molehills situation.

If you’re reply is to tell me how hard trans people have it, you can fuck right off, there are much bigger fish to fry.

That’s a ridiculous set of assumptions, just because gender rules your life, doesn’t mean it’s the same for everyone. Go seek attention elsewhere.

Well, sounds like a completely different instance then. Not sure why you would bring it up.

Edit: Do you think the people who are luring the pedo’s are also, seperately targetting trans people?

Obviously, if they’re targeting trans people specifically for being trans, i dont support that. But if they got lured by these guys, doesnt it mean they’re pedo’s?

It’s unfortunate this has to be taken into the hands of vigilantes. But it seems to me a necessary evil.

Nah, can’t have been too important.

What?

I don’t agree with that at all, if you don’t or can’t understand the terms of a contract, you sign at your own peril, expecting the government to step in everytime a person decides to excercise their stupidity is authoritarian and leads to a bloated, innefficient system. This thinking just makes contracts meaningless, it just means you can claim ignorance everytime you sign into a contract you don’t like.

Regulating food is whole different game for a number of reasons, i dont think it’s a reasonable comparison.

Blame the person you are related to. Duh.

A rape victim didn’t sign a contract saying that would happen if they went dont that alley. That’s the difference.

There is no bad guy in this case, just an idiot and a company.

New Zealand understands this, you can sign away a companies liability to yourself. For adventure tourism stuff mostly. It’s a good and fair way to do things I think.

Who should be responsible for these people agreeing to a contract and then not wanting to honour the contracts terms?

If personal responsibilty is “a whacked out take” then I’ll take that.

No one has any right to complain, this possibility is clearly outlined in the t&c’s every person agreed to.

Shouldn’t have handed out your defining essence to a corporation.

Same reasons people didnt act in germany all those years ago. First apathy and that will transition into fear of reprisal.