12·
23 days agoOn god no cap straight printer no fax
JWBananas
aka @JWBananas@startrek.website aka @JWBananas@lemmy.world aka @JWBananas@kbin.social
- 0 Posts
- 68 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 14th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
but the reduction gear is still a lot of weight.
But is it 88 pounds of weight like that donut motor? Because a traditional CV axle certainly isn’t 88 pounds.
Race cars have gone as far as having inboard brakes to reduce unsprung mass
The uniwheel sort of did too, given regenerative braking.
Sounds very You have been banned from /r/Pyongyang
Can confirm. Fitbit Charge 6 band did that to me until I replaced it with this style:
That bottom one looks embossed instead of printed. At the size of a USB-C cable plug, that’s going to be difficult to read outside of ideal lighting conditions.
The cable, not the package
Ultimately, it’s great that users won’t need to squint to read the fine print or cross-reference spec sheets once the labels gain popularity.
I can’t even read the labels on the cables in the article photos.
EDIT: I get it, you all have 20/10 vision and no astigmatism, thanks for your input.
1·1 month agoAre all your fans working properly? It might not manifest as a temperature issue if it can throttle sufficiently.
I would wager on a cooling issue
Elian Gonzalas
At one point Fox canceled like 20 other shows, with Greg the Bunny being one of them, between the time Fox cancelled Family Guy, and the time they brought back Family guy.
I have no idea what you’re trying to say. It’s not a counter example. It is literally the example given in the article, which you quoted.
The awards are more heavily influenced by album sales than subjective judgements of musical quality.
Do you know who Jon Batiste is?
The album won on quality. The sales spiked after the win.
every old Nissan I see falls apart
That says a lot more about the owners than it does about the vehicles.
And without the context that the Ars article provides, that information means very little to the casual visitor. There is absolutely nothing on that website to provide any of that context. It certainly doesn’t say that by uploading your photo, you are agreeing to allow Google an irrevocable licence to use it to train AI.
The only thing there is an image that says “Take control” which just links to the author’s cloud storage company. This whole thing is thinly-veiled viral marketing.
Sure, but that still feels very “You agreed!”. The only place on that website that tells you “beforehand” is hidden in the terms of service. That’s literally no different.
The site (TheySeeYourPhotos) returns what Google Vision is able to decern from photos. You can test with any image you want or there are some sample images available.
…by submitting them to Google, who then keeps a copy of them and uses them for the exact same purpose which purportedly compelled the author to leave Google.
Meanwhile